D
Datagma
Clay benchmark: Datagma = 97% email confidence

Datagma vs Kaspr

Benchmark-proven quality.

Kaspr is great for LinkedIn prospecting. But for benchmark-proven data quality, Datagma achieves 97% email confidence (tied #1) in Clay’s official tests.

3 phones + 90 emails free/month10 seats includedNo credit card needed

Clay benchmark results.

Real data quality tested by Clay & TitanX, not marketing claims.

Email Confidence Score

Clay benchmark: SMB segment (1,075 contacts)

97%
Datagma
Tied #1 with Hunter, Icypeas, Prospeo
Kaspr
Not in Clay’s top benchmark results

Phone Coverage (EMEA)

Clay benchmark: TitanX verified (9,806 numbers)

#3
Datagma
730 phone numbers found
Kaspr
LinkedIn-focused, limited EMEA coverage

Feature comparison

FeatureDatagmaKaspr
Email confidence (Clay)97%, #1 tiedNot ranked
EMEA phone coverageTop 3 (730 numbers)LinkedIn-only
APAC phone coverageTop 2 (491 numbers)Limited
Input typesName, LinkedIn, Twitter, email, domainLinkedIn-focused
Input flexibilityName, LinkedIn, Twitter, email, domainLinkedIn profiles
Seats included10 seatsPer-user
Job change alerts
Chrome extension
API accessAll plansPremium only
Clay integrationNative provider
WhatsApp integration

Pricing comparison

Datagma Plans

Free$0/mo
90 emails + 3 phones • 10 seats
Regular$49/mo
3,000 emails + 100 phones • 10 seats
Popular ⭐$99/mo
7,500 emails + 250 phones • 10 seats
Expert$249/mo
22,500 emails + 750 phones • 10 seats

Kaspr Plans

Free$0
Limited credits
Starter$49/user/mo
Per-user pricing
Business$79/user/mo
More features • Per-user
Organization$99/user/mo
Full access • Per-user

Per-user pricing: 5 users = $245-495/mo

Frequently asked questions

How does Datagma's quality compare to Kaspr?
In Clay's official benchmarks, Datagma achieves 97% email confidence score (tied #1). Kaspr is LinkedIn-focused and doesn't appear in Clay's top benchmark results for email accuracy.
Is Kaspr better for LinkedIn prospecting?
Kaspr has a beautiful LinkedIn-optimized Chrome extension. However, Datagma works with any input, LinkedIn, name+company, Twitter, email, domain: giving you more flexibility.
Which has better EMEA coverage?
Datagma is Top 3 for EMEA phone coverage with 730 numbers in Clay's benchmark. Kaspr is LinkedIn-focused with limited independent EMEA phone data.
Which is cheaper for teams?
Datagma. All plans include 10 seats. Kaspr charges per-user ($49-99/user/mo). A 5-user team on Kaspr Business costs $395/mo vs Datagma Popular at $99/mo.
Does Datagma integrate with Clay?
Yes. Datagma is a native Clay provider and appears in Clay's recommended waterfall configurations. Kaspr doesn't have native Clay integration.
97%

Email accuracy (Clay certified)

250M+

Global phone numbers verified

70-80%

Match rate (US/Western Europe)

You get with Datagma: One tool for emails + phones, no third-party integrations needed. Real-time data. EU-compliant. EU servers.

With Kaspr + email tool: Multiple subscriptions, manual data matching, higher costs, vendor risk.

Benchmark-proven quality.
97% email confidence.

Start free with 3 phones and 90 emails. No credit card required. 10 seats included.